Hit-and-runs are senseless tragedies that occur when a driver leaves the scene of an accident. Too often, the person who committed the hit-and-run leaves behind another person who has suffered injuries from the crash. By fleeing the scene instead of seeking medical attention, a hit-and-run driver leaves an injured victim helpless, often worsening the victim’s harm. When a driver’s actions lead to another person’s death, the deceased’s family may pursue a wrongful death lawsuit to hold the hit-and-run driver responsible in court.

As a recent news article tragically reported, a passenger lost her life following a hit-and-run in Washington, D.C. The accident occurred as a Ford was traveling north at an intersection when a Mercedes drove through a red light, slamming into the Ford. As a result of the crash, a backseat passenger in the Ford was ejected from the vehicle. Following the accident, the driver and passenger in the Mercedes ran from the scene. Sadly, the Ford passenger died at the scene. The other two occupants of the Ford suffered minor injuries.

Can You Bring a Lawsuit for Damages After a Fatal Virginia Hit-and-Run?

Virginia allows plaintiffs to bring a wrongful death suit after a fatal hit-and-run accident. Under Virginia law, the deceased’s personal representative must bring the wrongful death lawsuit. However, the law specifies that the resulting damages award will go to the deceased’s surviving spouse and children or, if the deceased did not have a spouse or children, the deceased’s parents, siblings, and any dependent relatives. A Virginia plaintiff can bring a wrongful death lawsuit against a defendant as long as the deceased would have also been able to bring a lawsuit had they survived the accident.

Continue reading

Too often, truck accidents have tragic consequences. The size and weight of a truck means that collisions tend to be severe. If you or a loved one suffers harm in a Virginia truck accident, you may be able to hold the responsible party liable for your injuries. A recent crash in Virginia illustrates the devastating harm that may result from a truck accident.

According to a recent news article, four people lost their lives in an accident involving two tractor-trailers and four cars in Montgomery County, Virginia. The accident occurred along as a family was traveling north on Interstate 81 in the rain when their U-Haul trailer lost control and spun around. The family members were then struck by a northbound tractor-trailer. Sadly, four of them died at the scene.

Can You Sue Employers for Employees’ Negligent Driving?

Virginia law allows plaintiffs to sue an employer for an employee’s negligent conduct under the theory of respondeat superior, which is also known as vicarious liability. To hold an employer liable for an employee’s negligence, a Virginia plaintiff must prove that the employee was acting within the scope of employment when the accident occurred. Employees act within the scope of their employment when they work at their designated time and workspace and perform a task that furthers the employer’s business. For example, truck drivers would act within the scope of employment if they injured someone while completing a delivery for the employer. However, if an accident occurred when the truck driver was using the employer’s truck for personal errands, that driver would not be acting within the scope of employment.

Continue reading

Too often, pedestrian accidents result in severe injury or even death. Typically, they occur when a driver fails to spot a pedestrian or a pedestrian crosses the road outside of a designated crosswalk. No matter the cause, when a person or their loved one suffers injuries after a pedestrian accident, they make seek to hold the responsible party accountable through a negligence lawsuit.

As a recent news article reported, a pedestrian accident tragically killed a three-year-old boy in Lynchburg, Virginia. According to eyewitnesses, the accident occurred when the child approached the side of a truck. As the truck driver began to travel, he struck the child, whom he did not see. Tragically, the boy died at the scene. Police are continuing to investigate the cause of the accident.

What Are the Elements of a Virginia Pedestrian Accident Lawsuit?

If a person or their loved one suffers injuries in a Virginia pedestrian accident, they can bring a personal injury lawsuit against the responsible party for negligence. In a negligence suit, the plaintiff must prove four essential elements by the preponderance of the evidence, meaning at least 51% more likely than not. Specifically, they must prove the defendant owed the plaintiff a duty of care, breached that duty through their action or failure to act, caused the accident through their negligence and that the plaintiff suffered harm due to the accident. The same elements of a negligence claim also apply to wrongful death suits. The intention behind wrongful death lawsuits is to hold the defendant responsible even though the deceased cannot sue them directly in court. Therefore, the person bringing the wrongful death lawsuit must prove that the deceased would have prevailed in a negligence suit had they sued the defendant directly.

Continue reading

When a driver runs a red light, they risk colliding with a vehicle traveling in a different direction. These red light accidents may result in severe injury or property damage to a vehicle. When these serious injuries occur, an accident victim may sue the driver who ran a red light for damages. An experienced Maryland personal injury attorney can help injured victims understand the laws that govern damages suits against a negligent driver.

As a recent news article reported, one person died and three people suffered injuries after a three-vehicle crash in Glen Burnie, Maryland. According to local police, a Toyota was traveling southbound when it ran a red light. The Toyota then drove right into an intersection, where it collided with a Chevrolet making a left turn. Unfortunately, a third vehicle was also turning left, and it was struck by both vehicles. A passenger in the Chevrolet tragically died at the scene. The Chevrolet driver, the Toyota driver, and a passenger in the Toyota were transported to the hospital for their injuries. As local police reported, the Toyota driver may have been driving under the influence of alcohol and speeding when the accident occurred.

How Can You Recover Damages After a Red Light Accident?

When someone causes injuries after running a red light, an injured victim may be able to bring a negligence claim to recover monetary damages. To succeed on a negligence claim, the plaintiff must prove the defendant owed the plaintiff a duty of care, breached that duty by acting carelessly or failing to act, caused an accident through their carelessness and that the plaintiff suffered consequent injuries, whether to their person or property. Examples of careless or negligent actions may include running a red light, distracted driving, or driving under the influence of drugs or alcohol. In fact, driving while distracted or under the influence may cause a driver to run a red light, potentially leading to a serious accident.

Continue reading

Not all traffic accidents involve two people driving cars. Drivers may suffer an accident involving public transportation, including trains and light rails. When a train conductor fails to exercise ordinary care, both passengers and other drivers on the road may suffer the consequences. To bring a successful negligence lawsuit after a Virginia train accident, it is crucial to understand the rules for recovery when the responsible party is a public transportation department.

According to a recent news article, a teenager died after a train accident in Linthicum, Maryland. The accident occurred as automatic roadway gates began to lower and block traffic for the light rail train to pass. Before the roadway fully closed, the train conductor entered the intersection, colliding with the passenger side of a sedan. The driver died at the scene. The railroad conductor was unharmed. Initially, investigators believed the accident occurred when the driver failed to heed warning signals that the roadway gates were closing. However, upon further investigation, officers found the conductor caused the driver’s death by entering the intersection before the roadway could close. As a result, officers charged the conductor with negligent manslaughter, criminal negligence, and reckless endangerment.

Can You Sue for Civil Damages After Criminal Charges?

Because criminal and civil cases are separate actions, you can bring a civil negligence lawsuit for damages against a defendant who is facing criminal penalties; a criminal case does not bar your civil claim. This is true even if the criminal penalties include fines, which remain district from a civil damages award to a winning plaintiff. Additionally, the lower burden of proof in civil cases may result in a different outcome from a criminal trial. Even if a jury finds a defendant not guilty in a criminal case, a jury in a negligence lawsuit could find that defendant liable for civil damages.

Continue reading

Even driving in clear conditions can be dangerous with a lapse of attention, mechanical failure, or unexpected actions from other drivers, pedestrians, or even animals. But when a driver is driving unsafely by recklessly disregarding the safety of other drivers or their passengers, including driving under the influence, tragedy is unfortunately even more likely to strike.

In Virginia, the chance of being in a crash due to alcohol-related reasons is one in six over an individual’s life. In 2019, 32% of traffic fatalities were alcohol-related, and nearly 19 thousand people were convicted of DUI.

According to a recent news report, a front-seat passenger died from life-threatening injuries sustained when the vehicle the passenger was riding in hit a utility pole at 7:15 PM. The car, a Volvo, was the only vehicle involved in the accident. Observers say there was no evident reason for the car to leave the roadway and strike the pole and that the driver of the vehicle was under the influence of alcohol. The driver was arrested at the scene, and the crash is currently under investigation.

Continue reading

Pedestrians in Virginia and the Beltway region have been at an increased risk of injury from auto-pedestrian accidents in recent years. Obsolete traffic control devices, as part of a broader shift away from pedestrian infrastructure, have caused more pedestrians to cross dangerous roads without the right-of-way, resulting in hundreds of injuries and deaths in recent years in the region. A woman was recently killed when attempting to cross the street from a restaurant in Washington County earlier this month.

According to a local news report discussing the incident, the 72-year-old victim was crossing the street in front of the Williamsport Waffle House restaurant on Route 11 an early morning in January, when she was struck by a GMC truck and died at the scene of the crash. Reportedly, it was still dark outside when the crash occurred, and visibility may have been an issue. The driver of the truck stopped after the incident and has cooperated fully with authorities concerning the tragedy, although the article does not note if a citation was issued to the driver after the crash.

Pedestrians in Virginia should exercise extreme caution when walking near a roadway or crossing the street. It is always best to find a crosswalk to cross a busy street and make eye contact with any stopping drivers before entering the road to ensure that they see you. Drivers owe all pedestrians a duty to avoid a collision and can be held accountable for causing a crash. A pedestrian who is hit by a vehicle while properly using a crosswalk has the right of way, and the driver of the vehicle can be held financially accountable for any injuries suffered in the crash.

In recent years, the dangers of prescription opioids have gained significant public attention. The public has now recognized the potential for severe opioid addiction and the dire health outcomes it portends. What has gained less attention is the link between opioid use and motor vehicle accidents. Research has shown that people who take prescription opioids are more than twice as likely to be involved in a car accident than people who don’t. As opioid use climbed from the 1990s and early 2010s, so did the number of fatalities among drivers who used prescription opioids. Until recently, however, little was known about the link between prescription opioid use and non-fatal motor vehicle accidents.

A recent study from researchers at Yale University sought to remedy this gap in knowledge. In a study of non-fatal accidents from 2014-2018, the researchers found that car accidents involving opioids have significantly decreased. The researchers started with de-identified data from roughly 255 million people with health insurance from all 50 U.S. states and Washington, D.C. From there, they looked at over 142,000 emergency room visits resulting from motor vehicle accidents. Then, they determined how many injured drivers had an active opioid prescription at the time of the accident. Each year, the number of drivers with opioid prescriptions dropped. By the end of the study, so did the number of accidents.

The study’s authors credit this change to the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)’s 2016 guidelines around the prescription of opioids. That year, the CDC provided guidance for doctors on whether to prescribe or continue prescribing opioids, along with the length and dosage of prescriptions. Additionally, the CDC offered strategies for assessing the risks of opioid abuse and the harm it can inflict on patients and their families. After the CDC published its guidelines, non-fatal accidents involving opioids decreased by 28%. According to an author of the study, this data suggests that more cautious opioid prescription practices have reduced the occurrence of motor vehicle accidents. The study’s lead author further credits lawmakers at the federal and state levels who have tried to address the opioid crisis. They praised measures including drug take-back programs, electronic databases that monitor the number of opioid prescriptions within a state, and further restrictions on opioid prescriptions.

The average driver usually pays little attention to the height restrictions that are posted while driving on roadways, passing under bridges, or entering parking garages. Many of these height limits or restrictions are vitally important for the safety of all Virginia drivers on our roads and highways. When drivers of high-clearance vehicles fail to abide by height restrictions, tragic accidents can happen. A semi-truck driver’s over-height load caused a horrifying crash near Richmond, VA on Interstate 95 earlier this month, which resulted in one death, as well as serious property damage.

A recently published local news report has discussed the crash. According to the report, a semi truck carrying heavy-duty steel construction beams which were loaded on the truck over the legal height limit passed under a highway overpass on I-95. The beams struck the roadway overpass, damaging the road above, and were pushed off the semi-truck and onto the roadway. A septic tanker truck that was following behind the semi crashed into the beams, causing an explosion and overturning the vehicle. The driver of the septic truck perished in the crash and resulting fire.

Drivers of personal, commercial, industrial, and construction vehicles are required to follow state and federal regulations concerning the height of their vehicles and their loads. The Virginia Motor Vehicle Code Section 46.2-1110 places a limit of 13 feet 6 inches on any vehicle, whether loaded or unloaded, for legal operation on public roads in the state of Virginia. In areas where roads have overhead clearances of less than 14 feet, state or municipal authorities are required to place signage at least 1500 feet before the obstruction to notify drivers of the reduced height clearance. If a driver causes damage to a bridge or road feature by driving a vehicle that is over 13 feet 6 inches or failing to yield to signs denoting a more restrictive clearance limit, they will be held financially responsible for damages caused under the VA Motor Vehicle Code.

In today’s world, it is common to see riders being picked up by popular rideshare services such as Uber or Lyft. These rideshare services offer convenience at the tip of our fingertips as individuals and groups book rides to get them from point A to point B using the mobile app on their phones. Rideshare companies have their own policies for dealing with car accidents that result while rideshare drivers are on the clock, and this includes their own requirements for insurance coverage. According to a quick look at Uber’s website, a partner driver must be insured, and while rideshare drivers are online with Uber, the company maintains auto insurance on the driver’s behalf. Figuring out exactly which type of insurance coverage a family member has after a serious accident can be complex.

According to a recent news article, a Maryland man working for a popular rideshare service company was killed in a car crash in Baltimore County, Maryland. His family is suing Uber, the rideshare service he worked for, due to a dispute regarding the amount of insurance coverage provided to the deceased man. In December 2021, another driver caused a car accident, resulting in the death of the man whose family is suing Uber and the death of the at-fault driver. In addition, other rideshare passengers suffered serious injuries. The other driver was driving on the wrong side of the road, resulting in their vehicles colliding head-on. In addition, the other driver was in possession of a stolen car, and toxicology results showed that he had cocaine and fentanyl in his system. The other driver did not have insurance. The family is suing Uber Technologies Inc., claiming that the company committed fraud. The family believes that their deceased family member had $1 million in insurance based on information found on Uber’s website, but Uber disagrees and is arguing that it is a fraction of that amount. The family is also suing the insurance company for wrongful death and breach of contract. A settlement conference was scheduled to occur to determine if the case would proceed to trial.

In some instances, disputes with rideshare companies and insurance companies regarding coverage and claims can lead to litigation. It can be difficult to decipher contracts, understand the laws that govern contracts, and understand exactly what coverage and claims may apply. This is why connecting with an experienced lawyer in your area can be extremely beneficial.

Contact Information