by

If you were hit by a car while walking or riding a bike in Washington, D.C., the rule that decides whether you can recover money for your injuries is not the same one that applies a few miles away in Maryland or Virginia. The District used to follow one of the harshest fault rules in the country, where a driver’s insurer could deny your entire claim if you were found even slightly responsible. That changed when D.C. passed the Motor Vehicle Collision Recovery Act of 2016, D.C. Law 21-167, and later broadened it through the Vulnerable User Collision Recovery Amendment Act of 2020, D.C. Law 23-183.

For an injured pedestrian or cyclist, this shift matters in real dollars. Under the current rule, codified at D.C. Code § 50-2204.52, your claim is no longer thrown out automatically just because you share some of the blame. You can still pursue compensation for your medical bills, lost wages, and other losses as long as your share of fault is not greater than the combined fault of everyone else involved. Knowing how this rule works helps you understand why an insurer may try to pin the crash on you, and why the evidence gathered early can decide the outcome.

The Old Rule That Could Erase a Claim Over a Single Percent of Fault

Continue reading

by

A truck crash on a Virginia highway can change your life in seconds, leaving you with serious injuries, mounting medical bills, and time away from work. When you start dealing with the trucking company and its insurer, you quickly learn that getting paid for those losses is harder than it should be. Part of the reason is a strict legal rule that Virginia still follows long after most states have moved away from it.

That rule is called contributory negligence, and it can block your recovery entirely if you are found even slightly at fault for the crash. In a state that uses a more forgiving standard, sharing ten percent of the blame might reduce your compensation by ten percent. In Virginia, that same ten percent can leave you with nothing. Understanding how this rule works, and how insurers try to use it against you, is the first step toward protecting what you are owed after a truck crash.

How Virginia’s Contributory Negligence Rule Works

Continue reading

by

A pedestrian crash in Washington, D.C. often turns into a fight over seconds, signals, and sightlines. An insurance company may claim the person on foot stepped out too fast, crossed at the wrong place, or was not paying attention. A personal injury lawyer looks at the case differently. The first question is usually whether the driver failed to yield, failed to keep a proper lookout, or ignored a pedestrian-controlled crossing movement. D.C. law defines a crosswalk broadly, including the part of the roadway at an intersection that connects sidewalks on opposite sides, which means a pedestrian does not always need painted lines for a crossing area to count as a crosswalk.

That point matters in city cases. Drivers often assume they only need to watch for pedestrians in bright, marked crossings. Real life in the District does not work that way. Intersections, turning movements, buses, rideshare stops, and dense foot traffic create situations where driver attention matters more than a neat paint pattern on the pavement.

What Counts as a Crosswalk in Washington, D.C.?

Continue reading

by

After a serious pedestrian crash in Montgomery County, the first few days often decide what evidence exists later. Families focus on medical updates and basic logistics, while insurers and investigators start shaping the record immediately. A recent Montgomery County Police press release describes a late-night pedestrian strike near East-West Highway and Washington Avenue, where the injured person later died. That kind of timeline highlights a hard reality in DMV injury cases. Evidence can fade or disappear long before a family feels ready to deal with paperwork.

The report describes a collision around 9:47 p.m., a hospital transport, and a later death date tied to injuries from the impact. Investigators from the Collision Reconstruction Unit remained involved, which usually means the scene and vehicle evidence may play a major role in determining fault.

What Families Should Preserve in the First 72 Hours

Continue reading

by

A chain reaction crash can injure you before you even understand what happened. You may feel fine at the scene, then wake up the next day with head pain, back strain, or numbness. You may also feel stuck because several drivers and insurers start pointing fingers. If you take the right steps early, you can protect your health and preserve the evidence needed to prove fault and damages.

What A Chain Reaction Crash Means In Real Terms

A chain reaction collision usually starts when one driver fails to stop in time and triggers a series of impacts. More than one driver may share responsibility, especially when several vehicles follow too closely or speed in heavy traffic. Investigators and insurers often debate the order of impacts, which vehicle caused the first hit, and whether a later strike caused the most serious injury. You strengthen your position when you treat the crash as a complex event rather than a routine fender bender.

Continue reading

by

A tractor trailer rollover can cause life changing harm in seconds. These crashes often involve high force impacts, spilled cargo, and secondary collisions that injure people who never touch the truck directly. If you were hurt in a commercial truck crash, you need a plan that preserves evidence, supports medical recovery, and identifies every responsible party.

Why Tractor Trailer Rollover Crashes Cause Severe Injuries

A loaded truck carries far more weight than a passenger vehicle, which increases stopping distance and impact force. Rollovers add unpredictability because the trailer can swing across lanes, block traffic, and spill debris. Even if you walk away, you may still face head injury symptoms, neck and back strain, or trauma that affects sleep and driving.

Continue reading

by

A recent multi-vehicle wreck in Charles County shows how fast a routine drive can turn into a life-changing event. Local reporting described a fatal crash near Mechanicsville that involved several vehicles, severe roadway damage, emergency medical response, and a complete reconstruction by investigators. News outlets noted that one victim died at the scene and others required hospital care after the chain-reaction collision. Situations like this highlight how multiple drivers, high speeds, and limited visibility create risks you cannot control. If you or a loved one gets caught in a crash of this nature, you face decisions about medical care, insurance claims, and evidence preservation long before you have processed what happened.

Multi-vehicle collisions often create questions about fault. Maryland’s approach to contributory negligence adds another challenge, since any finding that you shared responsibility can block financial recovery. Understanding how these cases unfold helps you take steps that protect your claim from the first day forward.

How Multi-Vehicle Crashes Unfold On Maryland Roads

Maryland roadways carry heavy commuter traffic, and multi-vehicle impacts tend to occur during peak flow or when drivers react suddenly to road hazards. Emergency responders in Charles County often describe a chain of events in which one vehicle loses control, another swerves to avoid impact, and a third arrives with little time to react. These crashes generate conflicting accounts from witnesses, uncertain timelines, and widespread damage across multiple lanes.

Continue reading

by

A fall on a waterfront promenade or boardwalk can change your life in seconds. These public walkways look like parks, but they often function as critical commuter routes with heavy foot and bike traffic. That distinction matters for your claim. Recent Maryland appellate guidance shows how courts analyze duty, notice, and statutory defenses when someone is hurt on a brick walkway, bulkhead edge, or similar path in a public space. If you were injured on a store’s sidewalk, a marina promenade, or a city-maintained path, you should understand how liability works and which defenses property owners try to raise.

Premises Liability In Maryland and The Duty to Keep Walkways Safe

Property owners in Maryland must use reasonable care to keep walkways safe for guests. That duty includes regular inspection, timely cleanup of spills or debris, repair of broken surfaces, and warnings when dangerous conditions cannot be fixed immediately. On public promenades and boardwalks, the same core principles apply, but disputes often center on whether the area is a “recreational” space or a transportation corridor. If the location functions as a public sidewalk or shared-use path, courts are more likely to treat it like any other thoroughfare, which keeps the property owner’s or municipality’s duty firmly in place.

Continue reading

by

You may still have legal options even if the driver who struck your loved one has not yet been identified. Maryland law allows families to pursue wrongful death claims after a fatal pedestrian crash, including those involving a hit-and-run. The recent fatal collision on Route 202 near Upper Marlboro illustrates the real impact these tragedies have, and how civil action can still move forward.

In this case, a man died while crossing the road just before sunrise. Investigators believe the vehicle that hit him was a 2012-2014 GMC Terrain or Chevrolet Equinox. Rather than stay at the scene, the driver left the victim behind. Authorities are working to identify the vehicle and its operator, but legal rights under Maryland civil law do not require a criminal case to be resolved first.

Wrongful Death Claims After a Fleeing Driver Crash

You do not need to wait for an arrest to file a wrongful death claim. Maryland allows surviving relatives to sue based on civil liability, which is distinct from any criminal charges that may or may not follow. If a fleeing driver caused the fatal crash, their absence does not block your ability to pursue compensation.

Continue reading

by

If you were injured while walking or cycling on public property, you may assume the city cannot be held responsible. That is not always true. A recent Maryland Supreme Court case, Mayor and City Council of Baltimore v. Wallace, confirms that cities cannot automatically escape responsibility by claiming the area was “recreational.” If the space functions as part of the public’s transportation network, the municipality may still face liability for your injuries.

You should be aware that you may still have a case even if the injury occurred in an area commonly used for leisure activities. What matters most is how the property serves the public and whether the city failed to maintain it safely.

Court Confirms City’s Responsibility When Walkways Serve Transportation Needs

Continue reading
Contact Information
MAIN OFFICE
6110 Executive Blvd #625
Rockville, MD 20852
Phone: (240) 833-3914
Fax: (240) 833-2974
WOODBRIDGE OFFICE
 13200 Marina Way #105
Woodbridge, VA 22191
Telephone: (703) 491-7070
Fax: (703) 491-0974

Please do not include any confidential or sensitive information in a contact form, text message, or voicemail. The contact form sends information by non-encrypted email, which is not secure. Submitting a contact form, sending a text message, making a phone call, or leaving a voicemail does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Copyright © 2016 – 2026, The Schupak Law Firm
JUSTIA Law Firm Blog Design